* Click here for the position of Ascending interferograms.
* Click here for the position of Descending interferograms.
* Also see "Crustal Deformation of the Chile Earthquake in 2010", GSI Geography and Crustal Dynamics Research Center Topics.
Chile Earthquake(2010/2/27,M8.8)
How to understand the SAR interferogram
No. | Interferogram | Specifications | Comments | Down load |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
2010.04.16up
![]() |
Observation date | 2010/02/25 2010/04/12 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.However, fringes which appear in the south side may be influence of radio wave propagation delay.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
116 6400-6460 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-516 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-39.10/-35.18/ -72.84/-71.67 |
||||
2 |
2010.04.16up
![]() |
Observation date | 2008/02/15 2010/04/07 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.However, fringes which appear in the south side may be influence of radio wave propagation delay.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
113 6400-6510 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
+285 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-39.09/-32.92/ -72.01/-69.30 |
||||
3 |
2010.04.16up
![]() |
Observation date | 2007/12/30 2010/04/06 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.However, fringes which appear in the south side may be influence of radio wave propagation delay.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
416 4330-4400 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-122 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-39.13/-34.53/ -71.00/-68.50 |
||||
4 |
2010.04.07up
![]() |
Observation date | 2010/02/13 2010/03/31 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.However, fringes which appear in the south side may be influence of radio wave propagation delay.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
118 6380-6430 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-772 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-40.06/-36.49/ -73.60/-71.57 |
||||
5 |
2010.04.07up
![]() |
Observation date | 2010/02/08 2010/03/26 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.However, fringes which appear in the south side may be influence of radio wave propagation delay.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
115 6400-6470 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-453 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-39.10/-34.50/ -72.58/-70.35 |
||||
6 |
2010.03.30up
![]() |
Observation date | 2010/02/03 2010/03/21 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.However, fringes which appear in the south side may be influence of radio wave propagation delay.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
112 6380-6530 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-543 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-40.06/-31.55/ -71.75/-68.36 |
||||
7 |
2010.03.30up
![]() |
Observation date | 2008/01/26 2010/03/18 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Descending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
423 4240-4270 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
+495 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-32.38/-30.16/ -71.72/-70.79 |
||||
8 |
2010.03.30up
![]() |
Observation date | 2008/01/26 2010/03/18 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Descending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
423 4360-4380 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
+567 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-38.10/-36.20/ -73.68/-72.76 |
||||
9 |
2010.03.19up
![]() |
Observation date | 2007/12/07 2010/03/14 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
117 6400-6450 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
+171 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-39.10/-35.83/ -73.22/-71.43 |
||||
10 |
2010.03.19up
![]() |
Observation date | 2010/01/26 2010/03/13 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears. However, fringes which appear in the south side may be influence of radio wave propagation delay.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Descending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
420 4330-4480 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-588 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-42.99/-34.53/ -74.23/-70.66 |
||||
11 |
2010.03.16up
![]() |
Observation date | 2010/01/22 2010/03/09 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
114 6460-6490 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-305 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-36.15/-33.76/ -72.20/-70.96 |
||||
12 |
2010.03.16up
![]() |
Observation date | 2007/07/17 2010/03/09 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBD/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
114 6400-6450 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-699 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-39.10/-35.47/ -71.98/-69.82 |
||||
13 |
2010.03.16up
![]() |
Observation date | 2008/01/16 2010/03/08 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Descending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
417 4330-4400 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
+429 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-39.13/-34.51/ -71.54/-69.04 |
||||
14 |
2010.03.09up
![]() |
Observation date | 2007/10/12 2010/03/04 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. (2010.03.10update) |
|
Observation Mode | FBD/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
111 6400-6550 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-268 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-39.10/-30.59/ -71.72/-68.23 |
||||
15 |
2010.03.03up
![]() |
Observation date | 2010/01/15 2010/03/02 |
The obvious crustal deformation caused by the earthquake appears.
*Accuracy of the used orbit data:High precision orbit data. (2010.03.08update) |
|
Observation Mode | FBS/HH FBS/HH |
||||
Orbital direction | Ascending | ||||
Off-nadir [degree] |
34.3 | ||||
Path Frame |
119 6390-6420 |
||||
Baseline[m] (Bperp) |
-484 | ||||
Range (lat/lon) |
-39.58/-36.97/ -73.69/-72.31 |